Sufficient resourcing
Have sufficient staffing and technical resources to enable processes, checks and oversight to function adequately.
This control targets both internal and external fraud risks.
Examples
Examples of this control include:
- adequately staffing frontline services to properly collect and verify relevant information
- adequately staffing counter fraud and compliance areas to identify fraud vulnerabilities in programmes
- adequately resourcing fraud detection and response employees
- ensuring ICT systems have the functionality, security and capacity required to support counter fraud activities effectively.
Risks from control gap
Inadequately resourced prevention and compliance processes, checks and oversight can lead to:
- potentially suspicious matters not being dealt with
- frustrated employees, clients or third parties who may become motivated to commit fraud or rationalise fraudulent or corrupt behaviour
- employees making errors or applying processes inconsistently due to workload pressures, leading to higher levels of non-compliance and fraud
- employees not applying processes and controls correctly, such as identity authentication, which fraudsters can exploit
- employees not recognising inconsistencies or red flags, e.g. someone providing false or misleading information or evidence to support a request or claim
- poor management of fraud and corruption risks
- employees abusing their positions of trust to commit fraud or act corruptly.
Assessing effectiveness
Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this control include:
- assessing the processing time for claims, registrations or other eligibility activities to ensure sufficient resourcing is in place
- monitoring performance activities to ensure adequate resourcing supports effective oversight
- conducting checks to see if processes are being followed properly
- undertaking a quantitative analysis of staffing levels and training completion
- analysing programme error rates and complaints
- checking that employee training plans and performance agreements clearly show the basic training they must complete
- undertaking an employee survey that includes questions on staffing levels.
Complementary controls
Other capability, prevention, detection and response controls that can enhance this control’s effectiveness:
Related fraudster personas
Types of behaviour this control is designed to mitigate:
The deceiver |
The enabler |
The organised |
Download the complete fraud control catalogue
Explore a range of controls that can be put in place to reduce the risk of fraud happening in your organisation.
More information
- Understand how employees perceive your organisation’s fraud control activities
- Find out more about the fraud triangle framework of pressure, rationalisation and opportunity
- See what tailored services the Counter Fraud Centre offers to public sector organisation to help safeguard public funds and uphold trust in government institutions
- Learn about the seven common personas that fraudsters use when committing financial crimes