Internal audits or reviews
Conduct internal audits or reviews to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes.
This control targets both internal and external fraud risks.
Examples
Examples of this control include:
- regular security audits of ICT
- programme performance audits
- random site visits for providers
- surveys to check the accuracy of regular payments
- monthly audits of employee travel expenditure
- regular reviews of grants allocations
- regular audits of credit card spending.
Risks from control gap
A lack of regular audits or reviews of activities can lead to:
- clients, employees, or contractors taking advantage of weaknesses in programmes and systems to commit fraud, act corruptly and avoid exposure
- reduced levels of compliance and increased errors due to inconsistent and unclear processes, rules and decision making
- fraudsters more easily committing fraud, due to inconsistent practices and processes being in place, and no fear of being exposed or prosecuted
- less transparency over the actions and decisions of employees and third parties
- increased opportunities for employees or contractors to take advantage of positions of trust to act corruptly, commit fraud and avoid exposure
- decreased ability to detect and respond to fraud or corrupt activity
- decreased accountability to prevent, detect and respond to fraud and corruption
- reduced ability to detect systemic fraud or corruption.
Assessing effectiveness
Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this control include:
- reviewing the outcomes of audits or reviews
- confirming that audits or reviews are carried out
- checking that audits or reviews are performed regularly
- confirming that the scope of audits or reviews consider fraud risks and controls
- confirming that audits or reviews are independent, completed by qualified persons and are resilient to corrupting influences
- checking what other reporting occurs, e.g. executive reviews of reports during committee meetings.
Complementary controls
Other capability, prevention, detection and response controls that can enhance this control’s effectiveness:
Related fraudster personas
Types of behaviour this control is designed to mitigate:
The corrupt |
The deceiver |
The exploiter |
The fabricator |
Download the complete fraud control catalogue
Explore a range of controls that can be put in place to reduce the risk of fraud happening in your organisation.
More information
- See what bespoke fraud prevention support services the Counter Fraud Centre could offer your public sector organisation
- Find out more about the fraud triangle framework of pressure, rationalisation and opportunity
- Learn how employees, contractors, vendors or business partners can harm an organisation from within
- Scan your organisation’s operations to identify potential areas of fraud risk and exposure