Coordinated disruption activity

Coordinate disruption activities across multiple programmes or agencies to strengthen processes for identifying serious and organised criminals.

This control targets both internal and external fraud risks. 

Examples

Examples of this control include: 

  • revoking funding approvals
  • deregistering businesses and individuals
  • conducting tax assessments
  • sharing information with other agencies to support due diligence processes
  • referring cases to the relevant law enforcement agency when evidence of criminal activity is detected or suspected. 

Risks from control gap

Poor or no coordinated disruption activities can lead to:

  • criminals repeatedly exploiting programmes
  • criminals shifting focus and exploiting new programmes
  • criminals exploiting multiple programmes
  • organised criminal groups using sophisticated methods to systematically target government programmes
  • agencies overlooking complex, organised offending by focusing only on opportunistic fraud.

Assessing effectiveness

Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this control include:

  • understanding the organisation’s capability to disrupt complex criminal fraud by consulting with analysts, investigators and other experts about the process
  • checking that disruption activities targeting a specific type of fraud have been implemented and completed in previous cases 
  • retrieving and analysing data related to a specific fraud, e.g. the number and type of actions taken.

Complementary controls

Other capability, prevention, detection and response controls that can enhance this control’s effectiveness:

Related fraudster personas

Types of behaviour this control is designed to mitigate:

The corrupt

The enabler

The organised

 

Download the complete fraud control catalogue

Explore a range of controls that can be put in place to reduce the risk of fraud happening in your organisation.

Download PDF