Employee and contractor rotation

Rotate employees and contractors to reduce over-familiarity with systems and limit opportunities for malicious activity.

This control targets internal fraud risks.

Examples

Examples of this control include: 

  • regularly rotating employees in high-risk positions
  • rotating contract managers so they do not develop a conflict of interest with suppliers.

Risks from control gap 

Leaving employees and contractors in positions for too long can lead to:

  • less visibility of fraud and corruption risks
  • employees or contractors taking advantage of positions of trust to act corruptly, commit fraud and avoid exposure
  • employees and contractors becoming overly familiar with processes and learning how to exploit weaknesses
  • fraud or corruption going undetected for a long period of time
  • employees being targeted and coerced to process fraudulent claims or invoices for another person or organisation.

Assessing effectiveness

Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this control include:

  • confirming the existence of a rotation policy or best practice guidelines for rotating employees through high-risk roles
  • confirming that high-risk roles are reviewed regularly
  • reviewing procedures or guidance to make sure it clearly specifies requirements for rotation and contractor engagement
  • reviewing statistics or reports on employees and contractor positions and durations.

Complementary controls

Other capability, prevention, detection and response controls that can enhance this control’s effectiveness:

Related fraudster personas

Types of behaviour this control is designed to mitigate:

The enabler

The exploiter

The organised

 

Download the complete fraud control catalogue

Explore a range of controls that can be put in place to reduce the risk of fraud happening in your organisation.

Download PDF