Random allocation

Randomly allocate requests or claims to employees to remove the option for employees to select which claims to process.

This control targets both internal and external fraud risks. 

Examples

Examples of this control include:

  • automatic push allocation in case management systems  
  • workflow-driven blind allocation where employees must take the oldest task in the queue first
  • automating email or chat distribution rather than employees selecting emails from a shared inbox 
  • supervisors reviewing and assigning tasks via a team meeting or in a shared tracker.

Risks from control gap 

Allowing employees to choose which requests or claims to process can lead to:

  • employees deliberately processing fraudulent requests or claims
  • employees being coerced to process fraudulent requests or claims by others.

Assessing effectiveness

Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this control include:

  • confirming random allocation processes are always applied
  • reviewing workload management specifications and system requirements
  • reviewing reports of work allocation, e.g. by location and user identification
  • undertaking fraud control testing or a process walkthrough to confirm that allocation processes cannot be circumvented, even when pressure or coercion is applied
  • reviewing approvals processes and making sure there is a segregation of duties
  • confirming monitoring and reporting processes exist for allocation and confirming this would identify abnormal processing patterns.

Complementary controls

Other capability, prevention, detection and response controls that can enhance this control’s effectiveness:

Related fraudster personas

Types of behaviour this control is designed to mitigate:

The corrupt

The exploiter

The organised

 

Download the complete fraud control catalogue

Explore a range of controls that can be put in place to reduce the risk of fraud happening in your organisation.

Download PDF