Public transparency

Publish information on your organisation’s decision-making processes, decisions made, successful tenderers or grantees, incidents and breaches.

This control targets both internal and external fraud risks. 

Examples

Examples of this control include publishing information on: 

  • your organisation’s decision-making processes
  • organisations or individuals receiving government funding
  • which decisions have been made
  • approved providers or licence holders
  • conflicts of interest from external influences
  • fraud incidents.

Risks from control gap

Opaque decision-making processes, tenders and incidents can lead to:

  • fraudsters concealing their corrupt or fraudulent activities
  • inconsistencies in tender, grant or licensing processes 
  • repeat offending by fraudsters across organisations 
  • employees manipulating bidding criteria to favour a particular supplier.

Assessing effectiveness

Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this control include:

  • reviewing decision-making procedures
  • reviewing information published on decisions
  • interviewing employees and stakeholders to identify their awareness of decisions made
  • confirming the existence of reference and guidance material to help in decision making
  • reviewing conflict of interest registers
  • reviewing how fraud incidents are reported and communicated.

Complementary controls

Other capability, prevention, detection and response controls that can enhance this control’s effectiveness:

Related fraudster personas

Types of behaviour this control is designed to mitigate:

The corrupt

The deceiver

The exploiter

The organised

Download the complete fraud control catalogue

Explore a range of controls that can be put in place to reduce the risk of fraud happening in your organisation.

Download PDF